In this blog post, we're diving into a Cursor vs Windsurf AI coding tools comparison, focusing on building a Notes app MVP.

We'll explore the strengths and weaknesses of these two popular AI-assisted app development platforms, giving you insights to help choose the right tool for your next project.

Setting Up the Cursor vs Windsurf AI Coding Tools Comparison

To kick off our comparison, we used Grok 3 to generate an initial prompt. This prompt included a Product Requirements Document (PRD) for our Notes app MVP. With this PRD in hand, we initiated the project in both Cursor and Windsurf.

Both tools use Claude 3.7 Sonnet as their AI model, which means we can expect similar capabilities. However, as we'll see, the implementation and results can vary significantly.

Building the Notes App MVP with AI-Assisted App Development

Our first task was to create a basic notes app with essential functionality. Here's how Cursor and Windsurf performed:

Initial Code Generation

• Both tools quickly generated HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files for the app
• Cursor initially suggested opening the app directly in a browser, while Windsurf recommended using a local server
• Windsurf encountered a minor issue with a persistent popup, which it resolved after prompting

Running the Apps

After some initial troubleshooting, both apps were up and running on local servers. The basic functionality was nearly identical, allowing users to create, save, and delete notes.

Enhancing Design with AI-Powered Design Improvements

Next, we challenged both tools to significantly improve the design, requesting a modern look with "pops of color" and a skeuomorphic style. This is where we started to see some differences:

Cursor's Design Approach

• Implemented a skeuomorphic notebook design
• Added color enhancements and interactive elements
• Included animations and even sound effects
• Quickly adjusted the design when asked to remove distracting animations

Windsurf's Design Interpretation

• Created a design with smooth transitions and interactive elements
• Added a paper texture and 3D buttons
• Required more prompting to fix design issues, such as background textures

At this stage, Cursor seemed to have an edge in design implementation and responsiveness to feedback.

Adding Advanced Features: Folders and Tagging Functionality in AI-Built Apps

To further test the capabilities of both tools, we asked them to implement notebooks (folders) and tagging functionality.

Implementing Notebook/Folder Structure

Both Cursor and Windsurf successfully added folder functionality, but with different approaches:

• Cursor maintained its skeuomorphic design and added color selection for notebooks
• Windsurf opted for a more minimalist approach but included all necessary functionality

Adding Tagging Functionality

This feature really put the AI coding tools to the test:

• Windsurf quickly implemented tagging with hashtags and sidebar display
• Cursor initially struggled, requiring multiple prompts to complete the feature

In this round, Windsurf demonstrated faster implementation of complex features.

Debugging and Troubleshooting with AI Coding Assistants

Throughout the development process, we encountered various bugs and issues. Here's how Cursor and Windsurf handled troubleshooting:

• Both tools were generally responsive to bug reports and feature requests
• Windsurf seemed more adept at handling complex code changes without breaking existing functionality
• Cursor excelled at quick design tweaks and minor adjustments
• Providing screenshots proved helpful for both tools in addressing visual issues

Comparing AI Code Generation Tools: Cursor vs Windsurf

After our side-by-side comparison, here are the key takeaways:

Strengths of Cursor

• Excellent at implementing creative designs quickly
• Responsive to design-related feedback
• Good for rapid prototyping and simple projects

Strengths of Windsurf

• Better at handling complex code structures
• Faster implementation of advanced features
• More suitable for larger, more intricate projects

Considerations for Choosing Between Cursor and Windsurf

• Project complexity: Cursor for simpler projects, Windsurf for more complex ones
• Design focus: Cursor might have an edge for design-heavy projects
• Development speed: Both tools are fast, but Wind surf seems quicker with complex features
• Debugging capabilities: Windsurf appears more robust in handling intricate code issues

It's important to note that both Cursor and Windsurf are rapidly evolving tools. Their capabilities may change significantly over time, so it's worth staying updated on their latest features and improvements.

If you want to use something a little more beginner friendly, consider Bolt and Lovable:

Want to learn more about building AI and no-code apps? Sign up for No Code MBA and take your skills to the next level! Our courses cover everything from AI-assisted development to popular no-code platforms. Join us today and start building your dream projects!

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Which AI coding tool is better for beginners?

For beginners, Cursor might be more approachable due to its intuitive design implementation. However, both tools offer user-friendly interfaces and can be suitable for those new to AI-assisted development.

Can these AI tools completely replace human developers?

While AI coding tools like Cursor and Windsurf are powerful, they're not meant to replace human developers entirely. They're best used as assistants to speed up development and handle repetitive tasks, allowing developers to focus on more complex problem-solving.

How often are Cursor and Windsurf updated?

Both tools receive frequent updates. It's best to check their official websites or documentation for the most up-to-date information on new features and improvements.

Can I use Cursor or Windsurf for commercial projects?

Yes, both tools can be used for commercial projects. However, it's important to review their terms of service and licensing agreements to ensure compliance with any usage restrictions or requirements.

Do I need coding experience to use Cursor or Windsurf?

While some coding knowledge is beneficial, these AI tools can significantly reduce the amount of manual coding required. They can be particularly helpful for those with limited coding experience who want to build functional applications quickly.